It did not disrupt any school activities. The passive expression of opinions by the students was in order. The decision of the school to include a policy that would see the punishing of those who wore such armbands in protest to being punished was outright illegal. It is a symbolic activity of expression and the first amendment provided for its legalization. The United States Court knew that wearing bands in an attempt to pass certain messages was an example of an act that is provided for by law. On appeal in the court of appeal, the court decided to affirm the decision made at the United States District Court (Johnson, 1997). It did not interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline. However, the action did not interrupt any operation in the school. The court knew very well that wearing such symbols of expression like the armbands was only to be prohibited if it significantly interfered with the operations of the school. With this decision, the court was ignoring the Fifth Circuit. The court claimed that it respected the action taken by the school because it was in the school’s constitution and it was meant to prevent any form of disruption to the school’s discipline. However, the court supported the decision by the schools and therefore dismissed the complaint. The family attempted to seek justice and get the court to restrain the officials of the school and directors from punishing the petitioners. The family of the students filed a suit in the United States District Court. This was when the wearing of the armband was scheduled to stop. They failed to return to school until New Year’s Day. Three students, including John Tinker, decided to violate this regulation and they were suspended. Petitioners became notified about the regulation (Johnson, 1997). If the student refused to remove it, he would be suspended until he decides to remove and abandon it. Any student wearing such a band would be asked to remove it. This prompted them to meet and adopt a new policy that would control such activities from the students. The plan by the students to wear the black armbands to make their views public was known to the principals of Des Moines. This can be seen in the way the students who decided to make peaceful protests were handled and treated. The education at the time seemed to have issues concerning the rights and freedoms of the students. Learn more Context of education at that period
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |